iranianforaryans

 

Roger opined thusly:

Ha! I agree. It is hard to understand how people can remain content with a diet of rock music after becoming aware of the pernicious influence of the Jew. Where do they think rock music came from? It is no different than saying, “rap music is fine with me as long as the peformer is white”. Not good enough.

After I began educating myself about the Jew through sites like Counter-Currents, TOQ and VNN, it did not take long to realise that it is necessary to re-evalute everything from first principles, in order to root out the Jew to the greatest possible extent. An obvious corollary of this is the rejection of rock music, as well as all other un-Aryan (or even anti-Aryan) forms of anticulture (not ‘counterculture’) being pedalled by the Jew. It makes no sense for WNs to listen to that noise, even from a propagandistic point of view. If I can listen to Haydn’s ‘Surprise’ Symphony, there is no need for Skrewdriver or black metal – ever! To do so would be pure self-deprecation.

Alex Kurtagic can write as much as he wants about the alleged continuity between the Conservative Revolutionaries of the Weimar Republic and the skinheads of the Norwegian black metal ‘scene’, but it does not change the fact that classical diatonic music is a far greater expression of the European Spirit and of the numinous. It also does not change the fact that Oswald Spengler, the best known Conservative Revolutionary, was a strong critic of nigger music, from which heavy metal in all of its incarnations is derived.

When black metal defenders argue that its form is more akin to classical music than to older blues-based metal music (a lie), they ignore the fact that the distorted guitar/bass guitar/drum kit ensemble can never lend itself to the same heights and standards as an orchestra or a chamber ensemble. Even if someone wrote in sonata form for a black metal band (haha), how could it be orchestrated in such a way as to make it as intricate and dynamic as a Brandenburg Concerto? It couldn’t, because that is not possible. Walls of distorted guitar noise underpinned with annoying drums cannot be used to create complex contrapuntal passages. It is such a pseudo-intellectual insult to posture the idea that black metal can ever be a neoclassical form merely because some of its practitioners have listened to the Ring Cycle and read Mein Kampf.

You do not respond to the Jew’s uglification of culture by creating an even uglier form.

The goal of the New Right is to engage in a metapolitical struggle in order to effect a complete cultural change, without which no real political change is attainable. So, where is the ardent and relentless promotion of classical composers, and of traditional European folk music (not neofolk)? Counter-Currents has made some progess to this end, but there is still too little attention paid to this area, and far too many articles about nonsense like Rammstein, Laibach and Skrewdriver.

For what it’s worth, I always like reading your comments on the C-C threads about music.

 

Their horrid taste in music, their unbeknownst-to-themselves Jewish views on women, and general state of spiritual dilapidation are too much for me to handle. Besides, the majority of them is low-brow; horribly so. It’s not enough to be racially aware. As one of my acquaintences said once,

All that WNs want to do is to wrest control of pornography from Jews and put it into their own hands.

 

I really am unconcerned about that. What I want to hear is whether you love Mozart, know something about Balzac, and agree with my contention of disenfranchising women.

 

The repetitious and monotonous essays and and articles about “that which we already know” concerning blacks, Jews, racial reality, democracy, the System, blah, blah, blah. I’m sick and tired of it. There are dozens of blogs out there and half-a-dozen sites that discuss the above topics to death.

We know what the problem is. We know what needs to be done. How much of the same trite ideas do we need rehashed for the nth time? Enough already! The ennui and moaning and groaning have made me sick!

My therapy for this is what Evola called for: apolitics. The situation is terminal. I’m violated at every juncture in the real world. The only panacea is Culture and Nature. They both furnish nourishment for the soul:  the immutable “je ne sais quo”.

This is why my writings deal more and more with music, literature, and Nature. I am becoming more and more of a recluse and thereby shunning my former gregariousness. If I need to leave the house, I hit the trails: the natural sites of my beloved state. I surround myself with good music and good books.

And it’s simply insufficient to be politically savvy concerning our plight. One must exude the Western spirit as well. Indeed, if I hear another rock’n'roll “song” I’m going to go on either a shooting spree or launch molotov cocktails. As I’m thoroughly incompetent in both fields, lack the proper equipment, and am not cavalier about cutting short my life while enlargening my aperture in my hind-section during a long immurement, I’ll stick with the life of an anchorite.

 

Roger:

Ridiculous. When all they have to say for themselves is, “look at me: I’m gay!”, it is the queer equivalent of the nigger mantra, “muh dik”. Yeah, we get it – you have no real concerns beyond dumb, ephemeral sexual indulgence. Stay in the gutters and out of the concert halls if you give primacy to sexuality above all else.

I was looking at Tchaikovsky’s Wikipedia profile last week, in which he is categorised as an “LGBT composer”. Yet another example of queer revisionists trying to reduce a great composer to “one of us”, even though he most certainly was not one of them (I’ll grant that he was a fag, but what does he have to do with lesbians and trannies, or political homosexuality?). If not for his unfortunate perversion, most of those fags would not give a damn about Tchaikovsky.

Thank you for your insightful commentary, Roger.  Classical music, as I’m sure you know, is far-removed, antipodal really, to things sexual, let alone grossly sexual. This is shared throughout all forms of classical music: Iranian, Arabic, Chinese, etc. To sexualize an art form that deals with Love, in its effulgent and ennobling form, is not only wrong, but malicious, given that it emanates from sex-crazed deviant homosexuals; excuse my redundancy.

 

Tchaikovsky wouldn’t even be a name on the sordid and crass lips of homosexuals if he wasn’t cursed with homosexuality. Indeed, and how right you are, Tchaikovsky is now a victim of homosexual revisionism. He is now a part of the “LGBT(Q) community”. That man, who would have been revolted at such a movement with all its grotesqueries, is now well on his way to being an unwilling mascot. How unfortunate!

 

Rex Kramer, Danger Seeker!

 

Why the emphasis on a man's genitals? Because homosexuals, who are lewdness apotheosized, are ruling the roost in opera.

Who is Jan Kobow? He’s a tenor of predominately Baroque music.

What an epicene shrimp! Yet another homosexual in early opera.

 

They cannibalize aborted fetuses and newborns thinking that their is some sort of salubrious energy and/or nourishment to be gained.

Smuggled pills made from dead babies, S. Korea says

 

with which ”our” fractious blightwing types horde weapons and ammunition are signs of their naivete and titanic natures.

 

As my friend, Dirty Olde Bastard, opined, the above concept is invidious. We both want it all. At one moment, I might be in the mood for a Grieg vignette; at another, a Bruckner symphony; his sixth, perhaps.

But, if I were put in a corner and my arm was twisted, I would ask for Beethoven’s piano sonatas; albeit, not the last ones, since the lead finally got to him.

© 2012 Iranian for Aryans Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha